Argentinean vs Macedonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,432,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 23.5 Macedonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $61,564, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and per capita income ($49,862 compared to $47,573, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $54,563, a difference of 0.75%), median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $59,522, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($50,399 compared to $49,893, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.45%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.68%).