U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,044,247 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.114% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to a decrease of 114.2 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $108,471, a difference of 31.1%), median household income ($71,853 compared to $93,899, a difference of 30.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,911 compared to $102,910, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $41,114, a difference of 12.9%), wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and median earnings ($41,448 compared to $48,266, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 56.4%), receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 55.2%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 23.0%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 41.5%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.37, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 84.2%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 80.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 54.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.34%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.6%).