Iroquois vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,014,821 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.108% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 107.6 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $93,899, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $108,471, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $66,161, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.6%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $44,000, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,114, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 49.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 25.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 6.4%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.37, a difference of 6.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 32.3%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.0%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 38.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.69%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.8%).