Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,663,172 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.492. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.107% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 107.1 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $57,930, a difference of 10.5%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $93,899, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $66,161, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $55,809, a difference of 0.26%), median earnings ($47,697 compared to $48,266, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $41,114, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 16.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.1%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 2.5%), currently married (46.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 40.8%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 35.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%).