Creek vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,809,686 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 37.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,447, a difference of 13.4%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $75,123, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $46,244, a difference of 0.76%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $40,851, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $53,950, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 30.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.11%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 118.2%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.0%).