Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,580,075 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to a decrease of 27.4 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,303 compared to $37,550, a difference of 31.3%), median male earnings ($59,806 compared to $46,244, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($111,378 compared to $87,191, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $51,447, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($41,820 compared to $35,444, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,277 compared to $53,950, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 46.5%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 43.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.2%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.41, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 85.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 18.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.91%).