Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,098,622 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to a decrease of 51.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,368 compared to $37,550, a difference of 36.8%), median family income ($118,325 compared to $87,191, a difference of 35.7%), and median male earnings ($62,728 compared to $46,244, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $51,447, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,672 compared to $53,950, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 57.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 50.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.9%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.41, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 0.18%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 90.3%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 84.8%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.8%).