Brazilian vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Chileans

Good
Excellent
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,196,057 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Chileans.
Brazilian Integration in Chilean Communities

Brazilian vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $63,957, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $106,611, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $56,973, a difference of 0.24%), median earnings ($48,356 compared to $48,504, a difference of 0.31%), and per capita income ($46,700 compared to $46,459, a difference of 0.52%).
Brazilian vs Chilean Income
Income MetricBrazilianChilean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
26.3%

Brazilian vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), female poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and poverty (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.76%).
Brazilian vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianChilean
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Excellent
11.0%

Brazilian vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Brazilian vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianChilean
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%

Brazilian vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Brazilian vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.4%

Brazilian vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.56%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.96%).
Brazilian vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianChilean
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Good
30.7%

Brazilian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Brazilian vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianChilean
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Good
6.4%

Brazilian vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).
Brazilian vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianChilean
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%

Brazilian vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
Brazilian vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianChilean
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%