Shoshone vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,328,316 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $106,611, a difference of 27.5%), per capita income ($37,072 compared to $46,459, a difference of 25.3%), and median household income ($72,660 compared to $90,605, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $53,185, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $40,757, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 45.9%), single male poverty (16.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 83.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 57.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.3%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.5%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.2%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.4%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.3%).