Bangladeshi vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bangladeshi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bangladeshis

Chileans

Fair
Excellent
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Bangladeshi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,473,466 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Chileans.
Bangladeshi Integration in Chilean Communities

Bangladeshi vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,897 compared to $46,459, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,402 compared to $106,611, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,363 compared to $99,900, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $53,185, a difference of 11.8%), median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $40,757, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $63,957, a difference of 16.9%).
Bangladeshi vs Chilean Income
Income MetricBangladeshiChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,897
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,358
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,112
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,263
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,744
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,960
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,589
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,363
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,402
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,719
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.2%
Fair
26.3%

Bangladeshi vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Bangladeshi vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricBangladeshiChilean
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
16.0%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Excellent
11.0%

Bangladeshi vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Bangladeshi vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBangladeshiChilean
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.4%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%

Bangladeshi vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.71%).
Bangladeshi vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBangladeshiChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.5%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.4%

Bangladeshi vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.6%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.3%).
Bangladeshi vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBangladeshiChilean
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.1%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Good
30.7%

Bangladeshi vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.0%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.0%).
Bangladeshi vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBangladeshiChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.4%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
6.4%

Bangladeshi vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 77.7%), no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 73.5%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Bangladeshi vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricBangladeshiChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.3%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.4%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.0%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Exceptional
2.2%

Bangladeshi vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Bangladeshi vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricBangladeshiChilean
Disability
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%