Arapaho vs Chilean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Chilean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Chileans
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chilean Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,357,696 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.185% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 184.9 Chileans.
Arapaho vs Chilean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $46,459, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $106,611, a difference of 40.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $99,900, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $63,957, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $53,185, a difference of 20.9%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Chilean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Exceptional $46,459 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Exceptional $108,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Exceptional $90,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Exceptional $48,504 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Exceptional $56,973 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Exceptional $40,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Exceptional $99,900 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Exceptional $106,611 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Exceptional $63,957 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Fair 26.3% |
Arapaho vs Chilean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 84.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.7%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.50%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.9%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Chilean |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Arapaho vs Chilean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 164.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 146.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 137.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Chilean |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Good 5.3% |
Arapaho vs Chilean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Chilean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Arapaho vs Chilean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 53.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.23, a difference of 12.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Chilean |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Good 30.7% |
Arapaho vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.2%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Chilean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Good 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 6.4% |
Arapaho vs Chilean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 84.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 82.9%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.31%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Chilean |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 62.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Arapaho vs Chilean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 47.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.70%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Chilean |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |