Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,795,838 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 14.0 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $40,757, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $48,504, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.0%), per capita income ($46,531 compared to $46,459, a difference of 0.15%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $108,429, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.8%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.1%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.21%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.4%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and bachelor's degree (41.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.45%).