Choctaw vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,193,111 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 18.5 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $106,611, a difference of 29.6%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $90,605, a difference of 29.5%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $46,459, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,185, a difference of 17.0%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $56,973, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.8%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.93%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.5%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.8%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 53.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 60.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.3%).