Immigrants from Oceania vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,594,668 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 13.4 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $106,611, a difference of 2.8%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $46,459, a difference of 2.7%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $63,957, a difference of 0.72%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.93%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,757, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 15.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.4%).