Canadian vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,901,009 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 95.0 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.0%), median household income ($87,769 compared to $90,605, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $63,957, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $56,973, a difference of 0.55%), median earnings ($47,911 compared to $48,504, a difference of 1.2%), and per capita income ($45,858 compared to $46,459, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.8%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 4.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.9%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.27%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.0%).