Carpatho Rusyn vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,223,416 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.909. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 7.698% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 7,697.8 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $53,185, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $63,957, a difference of 4.7%), and median household income ($86,635 compared to $90,605, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,825 compared to $40,757, a difference of 0.17%), median earnings ($48,617 compared to $48,504, a difference of 0.23%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $99,900, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.090%), single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.8%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and family households (61.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.13%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.28%), college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and college, under 1 year (67.9% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.0%).