Samoan vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Samoans

Chileans

Fair
Excellent
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Samoan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,156,507 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Chileans.
Samoan Integration in Chilean Communities

Samoan vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $46,459, a difference of 16.7%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $56,973, a difference of 10.9%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $48,504, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $63,957, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.7%).
Samoan vs Chilean Income
Income MetricSamoanChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,826
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,344
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Good
$86,498
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,206
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,389
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,498
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,610
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,385
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,580
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,427
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Fair
26.3%

Samoan vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Samoan vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricSamoanChilean
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Good
8.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Good
10.9%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Good
13.1%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.1%
Excellent
11.0%

Samoan vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Samoan vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSamoanChilean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Good
5.3%

Samoan vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Samoan vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSamoanChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.3%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Samoan vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.4%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), currently married (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Samoan vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSamoanChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
67.9%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.6%
Good
30.7%

Samoan vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 44.1%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 26.8%).
Samoan vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSamoanChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.0%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
6.4%

Samoan vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.4%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Samoan vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricSamoanChilean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Samoan vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.3%).
Samoan vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricSamoanChilean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%