Finnish vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Finnish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Finns

Chileans

Good
Excellent
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Finnish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,644,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Chileans.
Finnish Integration in Chilean Communities

Finnish vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 8.7%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $90,605, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $63,957, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.6%), median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $56,973, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($45,940 compared to $48,504, a difference of 5.6%).
Finnish vs Chilean Income
Income MetricFinnishChilean
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,461
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Average
$102,676
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,607
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,940
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,721
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,173
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,827
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,610
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$99,904
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,535
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Fair
26.3%

Finnish vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.64%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Finnish vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricFinnishChilean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Poor
21.5%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
11.0%

Finnish vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%).
Finnish vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFinnishChilean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.3%

Finnish vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
Finnish vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFinnishChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.9%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Finnish vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Finnish vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFinnishChilean
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.09
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Good
30.7%

Finnish vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.1%).
Finnish vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFinnishChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.3%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
6.4%

Finnish vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.8%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%).
Finnish vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricFinnishChilean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.4%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.7%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Finnish vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.30%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Finnish vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricFinnishChilean
Disability
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%