Bhutanese vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Chileans

Exceptional
Excellent
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 242,223,272 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Chileans.
Bhutanese Integration in Chilean Communities

Bhutanese vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $63,957, a difference of 13.0%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $90,605, a difference of 10.5%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $108,429, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $40,757, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,185, a difference of 7.3%).
Bhutanese vs Chilean Income
Income MetricBhutaneseChilean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
26.3%

Bhutanese vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.7%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.6%).
Bhutanese vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseChilean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
11.0%

Bhutanese vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
Bhutanese vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseChilean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.3%

Bhutanese vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Bhutanese vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
83.4%

Bhutanese vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.60%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Bhutanese vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
30.7%

Bhutanese vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.9%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.9%).
Bhutanese vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Good
6.4%

Bhutanese vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Bhutanese vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseChilean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Bhutanese vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Bhutanese vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseChilean
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%