Moroccan vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Moroccan
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Moroccans
Chickasaw
14.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,657,116 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 86.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 15.9% |
| Range | 22.3% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 6.1% |
| Median | 9.4% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Panama (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Greece (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Spain (14.5%, a difference of 0.82%), Yuman (14.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (14.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |