Moroccan vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Moroccan
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Moroccans
Chickasaw
13.2%
POVERTY
5.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,757,500 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 11.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 50.3% | 35.7% |
| Range | 47.1% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 15.3% | 16.2% |
| Median | 12.5% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from the Azores (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants (13.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
| Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |