Moroccan vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,724,810 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 62.2 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $46,187, a difference of 15.3%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $63,355, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $56,452, a difference of 0.080%), per capita income ($45,854 compared to $46,008, a difference of 0.34%), and median household income ($86,468 compared to $86,875, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 24.2%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.25%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.0%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (44.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.3%).