Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Zimbabwean
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Zimbabweans
9.0%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,125,913 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,670 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 5.4%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 14.9% |
| Range | 14.8% | 14.3% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| Median | 6.9% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabweans by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Japan (9.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Norwegian (9.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Danish (9.0%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Turkish (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Bolivian (9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |