Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Zimbabweans
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,087,969 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 0.52%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 10.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 59.7% |
| Range | 89.9% | 58.6% |
| Mean | 26.0% | 18.9% |
| Median | 20.2% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.4% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.3% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |