Immigrants from Lebanon vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,809,019 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.404% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 403.9 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,938 compared to $37,842, a difference of 24.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $52,888, a difference of 22.0%), and median household income ($91,887 compared to $75,814, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $50,852, a difference of 0.24%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($58,835 compared to $50,878, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.83%), receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 31.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 34.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.92%), currently married (48.2% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 83.7%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 63.1%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.95%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.5%).