Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,931,918 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Immigrants from Denmark.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,938 compared to $53,799, a difference of 14.6%), median male earnings ($58,835 compared to $64,625, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($110,159 compared to $120,445, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $52,612, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $43,646, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 44.2%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 16.2%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.15, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.17%), currently married (48.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 31.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.62%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.66%).