Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chickasaw
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chickasaw
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,152,791 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,688,443 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 32.1%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.0% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 19.4% | 45.6% |
Range | 16.4% | 41.0% |
Mean | 12.2% | 21.5% |
Median | 11.5% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 25.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Sierra Leonean (11.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Jordan (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Colville (15.1%, a difference of 0.95%), Dutch West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |