Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,543,858 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 14.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $54,593, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $60,647, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($49,682 compared to $49,368, a difference of 0.64%), per capita income ($46,938 compared to $46,430, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $42,229, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), single father poverty (17.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.46%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 19.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.30 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.5% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 49.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and college, 1 year or more (62.9% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.57%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.0%).