Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,572,099 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 92.6 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 16.6%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $39,421, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $47,851, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $99,136, a difference of 0.10%), median family income ($108,161 compared to $108,499, a difference of 0.31%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $62,736, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 35.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.8%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.69%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.3%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.44%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 85.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.8%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.3%).