Native/Alaskan vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,868,931 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $45,750, a difference of 37.5%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $108,499, a difference of 34.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $106,377, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $52,986, a difference of 11.1%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $39,421, a difference of 16.6%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 112.4%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 100.3%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 87.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and single female poverty (28.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.5%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 66.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.0%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 45.0%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 54.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.7%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 53.6%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.8%).