Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Immigrants from Thailand

Poor
Fair
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,627,926 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Immigrants from Thailand.
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $42,289, a difference of 45.7%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $83,327, a difference of 40.8%), and median family income ($70,989 compared to $99,840, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 9.7%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $38,810, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $50,645, a difference of 19.5%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Income
Income MetricNavajoImmigrants from Thailand
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Poor
$42,289
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Poor
$99,840
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Fair
$83,327
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Fair
$45,598
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Poor
$52,908
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Poor
$38,810
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Tragic
$50,645
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Poor
$91,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Poor
$97,400
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Fair
$60,217
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
24.5%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 115.7%), single male poverty (25.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 95.4%), and family poverty (18.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 94.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 34.7%), single female poverty (31.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 44.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 44.8%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoImmigrants from Thailand
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Poor
12.4%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 95.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 94.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 85.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.9%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoImmigrants from Thailand
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Average
5.4%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 13.7%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoImmigrants from Thailand
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Tragic
81.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 57.2%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.9%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoImmigrants from Thailand
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Tragic
45.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Poor
32.8%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Thailand
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
6.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 54.6%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 50.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and 8th grade (95.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoImmigrants from Thailand
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Fair
64.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Average
1.8%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.0%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability
Disability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Thailand
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%