Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Thailand

Average
Fair
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,020,323 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 233.9 Immigrants from Thailand.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 11.1%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $42,289, a difference of 3.2%), and median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $52,908, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($83,193 compared to $83,327, a difference of 0.16%), median earnings ($45,732 compared to $45,598, a difference of 0.29%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $50,645, a difference of 0.39%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Thailand
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Poor
$42,289
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Poor
$99,840
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Fair
$83,327
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Fair
$45,598
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Poor
$52,908
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Poor
$38,810
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Tragic
$50,645
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Poor
$91,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Poor
$97,400
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Fair
$60,217
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
24.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Thailand
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
17.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Poor
12.4%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.58%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Thailand
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Average
5.4%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Thailand
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.070%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Thailand
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
45.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Poor
32.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Thailand
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
6.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.5%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and high school diploma (90.6% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Thailand
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Fair
64.7%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Poor
36.5%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and male disability (13.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Thailand
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
24.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%