Pima vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,504,855 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.982. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 24.0 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,289, a difference of 38.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $97,400, a difference of 32.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $83,327, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,645, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,810, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $91,337, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 107.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 96.3%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 29.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 127.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 115.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 57.1%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 57.4%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 53.1%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 58.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.1%).