Scottish vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,850,134 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 41.2 Immigrants from Panama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 24.5%), median family income ($104,288 compared to $95,647, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $93,815, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $51,278, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $39,049, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $45,198, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 38.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.5%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 116.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.92%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 2.4%).