Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Panama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,022,622 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.139% in Immigrants from Panama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 139.0 Immigrants from Panama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 44.8%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $56,944, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $93,815, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,596 compared to $45,198, a difference of 0.88%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $89,451, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($41,123 compared to $41,853, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 30.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 33.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (37.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 18.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.1%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 155.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 106.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 95.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 36.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 78.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 95.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Panama communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.8%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.050%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.6%).