Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Italy Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,674,003 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Italy. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 8.6 Immigrants from Italy.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $48,654, a difference of 28.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $105,201, a difference of 23.0%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $112,848, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $54,449, a difference of 8.8%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $64,065, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.9%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.2%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.3%).