Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Bahamas
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Bahamas
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,084,570 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.844. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 162.8 Immigrants from Bahamas.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 29.0%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $45,176, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,793, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,356 compared to $84,732, a difference of 0.74%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,174, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $83,177, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,193 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $84,732 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $71,349 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $39,861 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $45,176 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $35,027 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,793 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $76,910 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $83,177 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $53,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bahamas |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 41.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 41.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 40.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bahamas |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.090%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bahamas |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 88.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bahamas Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.5% |