French American Indian vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,244,331 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 87.2 Immigrants from Bahamas.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 20.4%), median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $45,176, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $76,910, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $53,174, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $35,027, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $45,793, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and single male poverty (15.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.2%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.92%), family households (62.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.51%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and college, under 1 year (62.4% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%).