Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,667,701 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Immigrants from Bahamas.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $76,910, a difference of 26.9%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $84,732, a difference of 25.6%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $71,349, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $35,027, a difference of 15.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $45,793, a difference of 17.2%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $39,861, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 31.2%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.73%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%).