Central American vs Immigrants from Venezuela Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,041,348 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Venezuela. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Immigrants from Venezuela.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 13.5%), per capita income ($38,560 compared to $41,727, a difference of 8.2%), and median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $52,041, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $37,003, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $57,371, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $87,038, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 27.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.1%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.57%), family households (66.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.3%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.3%).