Central American vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Chinese
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,607,285 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 72.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 51.9% | 19.1% |
| Range | 49.3% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 6.8% |
| Median | 11.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |