Central American vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,237,092 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 7.0%), per capita income ($38,560 compared to $37,407, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $35,629, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $85,066, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $90,811, a difference of 0.15%), and median family income ($91,087 compared to $90,918, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 0.37%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.5%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (43.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.43, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 9.8%), master's degree (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.23%), ged/equivalency (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%).