Portuguese vs Chinese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Portuguese
Chinese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Portuguese
Chinese
8.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Chinese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,384,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,763,306 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 4.3%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 21.5% | 19.8% |
Range | 20.4% | 18.5% |
Mean | 8.1% | 6.6% |
Median | 7.3% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Chinese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovak (8.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Thai (8.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Croatian (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Canadian (8.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Thais | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |