Portuguese vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 402,360,623 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $49,302, a difference of 11.1%), median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $60,265, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $64,856, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $53,307, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $41,319, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $102,407, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and single female poverty (20.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.71%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.5%).