Immigrants from Philippines vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,664,211 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $52,440, a difference of 10.5%), median household income ($93,899 compared to $88,388, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,161 compared to $62,354, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $55,954, a difference of 0.26%), median earnings ($48,266 compared to $47,697, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $40,353, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.1%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and single female poverty (18.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.4%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 2.5%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.8%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.1%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%).