Immigrants from Philippines vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,127,343 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $82,736, a difference of 31.1%), median household income ($93,899 compared to $71,853, a difference of 30.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $78,911, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $36,424, a difference of 12.9%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and median earnings ($48,266 compared to $41,448, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 56.4%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 55.2%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 23.0%), single father poverty (14.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 41.5%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 84.2%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 80.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 54.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.13%), 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.34%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.6%).