Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Chinese
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,729,486 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 23.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 24.5% | 19.1% |
| Range | 23.5% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 6.8% |
| Median | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |