Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Chippewa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Chippewa
15.5%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Chippewa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,374,473 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,014,776 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Chippewa |
Minimum | 4.4% | 8.1% |
Maximum | 98.2% | 71.1% |
Range | 93.8% | 63.0% |
Mean | 24.6% | 24.2% |
Median | 18.5% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.4% | 31.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 16.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.2% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Chippewa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Guatemala (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Caribbean (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.47%), African (15.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and Somali (15.4%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Cajun (15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Seminole (15.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Choctaw (15.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Grenada (15.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.4% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.6% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 15.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.1% |