Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Hispanic or Latino
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Hispanics or Latinos
Chickasaw
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 570,237,836 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 43.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 4.8% | 21.2% |
| Range | 3.2% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 7.4% |
| Median | 3.1% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.46% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.46% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Hispanics or Latinos by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |