Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,037,059 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 6.0 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,688 compared to $46,876, a difference of 31.4%), median family income ($85,647 compared to $108,691, a difference of 26.9%), and median male earnings ($46,419 compared to $58,131, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $52,190, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $62,645, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.7%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.88%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 38.8%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (67.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 70.9%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 70.6%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 5.4%).